![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quite a few people have criticized the NASA architecture for developing
new launch vehicles whilst lower cost alternatives exist, or will exist. Suppose in 2011, - SpaceX has flown Falcon 9 succesfully, including its 25 ton version. - The President says "Constellation is a good idea, but needs to be done cheaper, so scrap the SDHLV and save $10 billion". A descent moon mission could be flown with three Falcon 9 launched Earth Departure Stages, with no orbital propellant transfer, and "assembley" consisting of joining up units. (Already planned). The CEV could be launched on the Stick (only a NASA vehicle being good enough for its Astronauts). The Earth Departure Stages would be cheap, and assembled in volume, and launched well before the other flights. But how can you get a descent lunar lander, capable of landing ~10 tons on the lunar surface, into the 5.2m dimater faring offered by SpaceX (or Boeing, LM, or the Stick)? Can this be done without orbital assembley? One idea I had would be a lander that consists of two propulsion units that would fit either side of the payload, and would be joined across the top by a "bridge". The payload would fit in the middle, suspended from the joining bridge. This bridge would be telescopic, enabling the two propulsion units to be launched together inside a single faring. This has the advantage that no crane or ramp is needed to lower the payload to the lunar surface, and payload can be of almost any shape and size. However, it needs two propulsion units, and both must work, doubling failure probability. and engine out would lead to certain mission destruction. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA PDF - Apollo Experience Reports - 114 reports | Rusty | History | 1 | July 27th 05 03:52 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | August 1st 04 09:08 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | UK Astronomy | 11 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |