![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a C9.25 that is perfectly collimated and provided excellent planetary
views and images, however this scope does not have the XLT coatings. I am wondering how much is to be gained in performance by the XLT coatings. I have seen many of these scopes flipped on Astromart and am considering doing it myself, taking a small loss, and purchasing another C9.25 OTA with XLT coatings and possibly carbon fiber. What does everyone think? Has anyone ever done a side-by-side comparison of a Celestron with XLT to a Celestron without XLT? What is the difference visually, if any? Thanks, -mij |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | MrPepper11 | Astronomy Misc | 422 | May 4th 05 03:56 PM |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | MrPepper11 | Policy | 437 | May 4th 05 03:56 PM |
SCT coating specs, take with a grain of salt? | RichA | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | November 8th 04 06:48 PM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Bob Midiri | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 6th 03 06:13 PM |
Celestron introduces XLT Coatings | Barry Simon | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | July 30th 03 09:50 PM |