![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
**I'm posting this in this NG as this post was rejected by the moderator in
sci.space.tech.** http://www.space.com/businesstechnol..._031217-1.html I'm personally not a fan of antimatter propulsion at this time as there's no safeguarding technology for when the launch or a component during flight fails. The only way to encapsulate antimatter at this time is through magnetic containment, which needs power and a complex control system. If these fail during launch or at any time during the flight the result will be an explosion which dwarfs that of a hydrogen bomb. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Antimatter propulsion | Jorge R. Frank | Technology | 21 | January 27th 04 04:58 AM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | asps | Space Shuttle | 49 | December 21st 03 09:25 PM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | Franz Heymann | Policy | 8 | December 13th 03 06:29 PM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | Harry Conover | Policy | 0 | December 11th 03 08:18 PM |