![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott M. Kozel wrote:
These are enough - the most advanced bomber of WWII, the first supersonic transport, and the first space shuttle. One useful acquisition out of three ain't bad ![]() Cardman wrote: I am now wondering if we stole some Soviet designs? What I can never figure out is why nobody copied the T-34, not only the best tank of World War 2 but a relatively simple design that wouldn't have been that hard to copy. -- "Always look on the bright side of life." To reply by email, replace no.spam with my last name. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | History | 158 | December 13th 14 09:50 PM |
Stop Space Based Weapons! | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 1 | May 22nd 05 03:35 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Astronaut | Misc | 0 | January 31st 04 03:11 AM |