![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 23:01:43 GMT, Cardman wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 23:39:25 +0200, "Rene Altena" wrote: How do you qualify the russian Buran spacecraft (even though it is out of service)? They tend to label it under a "space shuttle". You can read more about it here... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran Kind of a shame that this one never had more use than the one successful auto flight. As the Buran seemed to be a better "space shuttle" than the US Space Shuttle is. Its only flight wasn't really all that successful. It just barely missed being so badly damaged by aerothermodynamic heating that it broke up in mid-air. It was so damaged that it couldn't be flown again. As you say, it was an interesting vehicle and it's too bad they had so much damage, but I wouldn't really classify it as being better than the Orbiter. The Orbiter only melts its structure if something goes wrong, after all. Mary -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer We didn't just do weird stuff at Dryden, we wrote reports about it. or |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | History | 158 | December 13th 14 09:50 PM |
Stop Space Based Weapons! | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 1 | May 22nd 05 03:35 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Astronaut | Misc | 0 | January 31st 04 03:11 AM |