![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rand Simberg" wrote in message ... On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 17:58:58 +0200, in a place far, far away, "Rene Altena" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: It may not be an STS replacement, but a shuttle it surely is. Only if you think that the word "shuttle" means any partially reusable vehicle that goes into and returns from orbit. That's not a definition in any dictionary of which I'm aware. The Shuttle is called 'Shuttle' because it is a Shuttle-service: up-down-up-down-up-down-up-down etc. etc. That doesn't mean that everything that goes up and down must be called a shuttle. Should we rename elevators "shuttles"? So this European-Russian spacecraft is a shuttle. Only by your definition, and that of others who share your narrow viewpoint. Aha! Already starting the ad-hominems? My my! Pray tell: why do you think it was called the Space Shuttle to begin with? I am curious... Rene |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | History | 158 | December 13th 14 09:50 PM |
Stop Space Based Weapons! | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 1 | May 22nd 05 03:35 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Astronaut | Misc | 0 | January 31st 04 03:11 AM |