![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Joseph Lazio wrote: In contrast, the spatial extent of the Universe could be infinite. If so, it always has been infinite. Another question, if I may. If the extent is infinite does that imply that there are guaranteed to be other regions (an inifinite number possibly) the size of our visible universe that have the identical quantum state? I seem to remember a Scientific American article that asserted this. Further, does such a universe guarantee regions the size of our visible universe which exhaust the possible quantum states of such a region. You know where I'm going, I'm sure. If this is true then the ultimate anthropic principle seems to be that we are here seeing what we see simply because it is possible. The only mystery that would be left relative to our existence is the infinitude itself that provides for it. Further yet, can symmetries be broken differently in different regions and if so does that say that all possible tunings, including the fine one we find ourselves in, must exist somewhere, somewhen? Thanks, Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What are Quasars made of? | Paul Hollister | Astronomy Misc | 17 | March 9th 05 04:42 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 9th 04 06:30 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 8 | September 7th 04 12:07 AM |
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? | Yoda | Misc | 102 | August 2nd 04 02:33 AM |
A dialogue between Mr. Big BANG and Mr. Steady STATE | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 12 | August 6th 03 06:15 AM |