![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More like a Big Hoax or a Big Media Fizz .....
undoubtedly forms of matter we dont even know about were associated with the socalled act of creation - until those are specified everything else is pure speculation (something the media is good at). p6 wrote: What's more likely. A Big Bang where everything starts from a singularity or M-theory Big Splat (ekpyrotic scenerio) where two higher dimensional colliding branes produced the matter and energy in our universe?? Note that researchers said the two produced the same result. We are mostly familiar with Big Bang where the entire universe before inflation is just planck size. Another model called Big Splat or ekpyrotic scenerio can also cause the flatness of the horizon and space and results in microwave background radiation too due to the recombination of nuclei and electrons that released the radiation and the responding expanding of space causing the gamma rays and other higher rays to slowly turn to microwave. I think Big Splat (ekpyrotic scenerio) is more likely than a Big Bang (which is a bit way off). What do you think? p6 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What are Quasars made of? | Paul Hollister | Astronomy Misc | 17 | March 9th 05 04:42 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 9th 04 06:30 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 8 | September 7th 04 12:07 AM |
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? | Yoda | Misc | 102 | August 2nd 04 02:33 AM |
A dialogue between Mr. Big BANG and Mr. Steady STATE | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 12 | August 6th 03 06:15 AM |