![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rand Simberg" wrote in message
... You are now saying that SPS is "absurd" given the current space launch capability of the world. I'm saying that because anyone with a lick of engineering knowledge who's studied the problem has come to that conclusion. anyone with a lick of engineering knowledge has long since come to teh conclusion that SPS doesn't work, Rand. Why do you find that so hard to accept? So now you have to assume some magic booster gets No magic. Just intelligently designed. so you're saying that all the current booster designs are...not intelligently designed? -- Terrell Miller "Very often, a 'free' feestock will still lead to a very expensive system. One that is quite likely noncompetitive" - Don Lancaster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |