New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

newedana wrote:
You don't know, nuclear fission and fusion are philosophically opposite reaction,

Nuclear fission and fusion are *physically* opposite reactions. They
have nothing to do with philosophy.


right? For example, meeting and departing are the same?

No.


You know only energy.

Why do you think so?



Do you know energy is a macroscopic concept?

It originally was, but it works also nicely in the microscopic world.


Your people reversely interprets the natural law like that way?

Huh?


If a reaction is exothermic there must occur a mass loss. Nonsense!

Why is that nonsense?


BTW: you have *still* not explained why in nuclear reactions, the lost
mass m is related to the released energy E by E=mc^2, *ACCORDING TO
OBSERVATIONS*.


We know when particle physicists encounter a logical crises they hide
themselves behind this energy shadow,

Huh?


under the name of quantitative calculation,

Hint: that are these things which Yoon is apparently unable to do.


done based on a stupid non-scientific postulation.

This "postulation" *AGREES WITH OBSERVATIONS*. So how could it be
stupid and non-scientific?

Why do you keep fleeing the experimental evidence?


Bye,
Bjoern