A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old May 30th 05, 12:52 PM
newedana
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The energy emission taking place when orbital electron rings expand, can b=
e observed in the case when chemical explosives such as TNT (trinitrotoluen=
) explodes. The outermost orbital electron rings of their component atoms c=
ontributing to combine them, expand only a little bit in this case of explo=
sion, due to dissociation of TNT to form various kinds of gas molecules, su=
ch as H2O, CO2, and NO2 etc.

It is well known that the explosion of only about 7 kgs of uranium 235 pro=

duces such an enormous energy equivalent to that emitted by explosion of TN=
T 20,000 metric tons. The mass ratio of these two explosive materials is a=
bout, 1 : 2.86x10^6. If the orbital electron rings in K shell of uranium at=
om with radial parameter, say, =CE=B3=3D1/100, expands to be the orbital el=
ectron rings in K shell of newly created atoms that has radial parameter, s=
ay, =CE=B3=3D1/99.28, then the ratio of energy capacity of these two orbita=
l electron rings becomes the same as the mass ratio, 2.86x10^6 , as shown a=
bove when we estimate it with Eq.=E2=96=B3E=3DE'(1/r^4, previously posted. =
The difference of radial parameter between these two electron rings is neg=
ligibly small, or =CE=94=CE=B3=3D1/99.28-1/100=3D1/13,789, but the ratio of=
their energy capacity is enormous, as shown above. However, this energy em=
ission comes only from the expansion of orbital electron rings in K shell o=
f uranium 235. Other orbital electron rings in L, M, N,. . . .shells of ura=
nium 235 would also have to expand their orbital radii emitting huge energi=
es also as in the case of electron rings of K shell. Thus the explosion of =
only 7 kg of uranium 235 gives rise to producing such a tremendous energy.

The fundamental mechanism of emitting energy from nuclear fusion of deuter=

ons is exactly the same as that of nuclear fission of uranium 235. It is al=
so the expanding energy of electron rings. In the case of nuclear fission a=
tomic electron rings expand, while in the case of nuclear fusion nuclear e=
lectron rings associated in the structure of two deuterons expand, emitting=
nuclear energy. When nuclear electron rings of two deterons combine to bui=
ld a unified nuclear electron ring with pair electrons, they have to expand=
their orbital radii emitting energy, in order to bind four protons to buil=
d two neutrons and two protons in a helium nucleus. This is the nuclear fus=
ion energy. It is the same as that when two hydrogen atoms combine to form =
a hydrogen molecule having molecular electron rings carrying pair electrons=
, with their two single atomic electron rings, emitting energy.
A single nuclear electron ring that binds two protons in constructing a ne=

uteron, can emit =CE=B3-rays at the nearest distance to its two nuclear pro=
tons when it breaks. Since this single nuclear electron ring can emit =CE=
=B3-rays with wavelength 0.005 =E2=84=AB, its radial parameter must be, =CE=
=B3=3D1/430, when we estimate it with the same equation, =E2=96=B3E=3DE'(1/=
r^4) I posted above. If these single nuclear electron rings expand their or=
bital radii and emit energy equivalent to that energy given by explosion of=
7 kgs of uranium 235, their radial parameter has to expand from =CE=B3=3D1=
/430 to =CE=B3=3D1/429.991. The distinction between them is, =E2=96=B3=CE=
=B3=3D1/429.991-1/430=3D1/20,544,014. It is an awfully small expansion comp=
ared to that in the case of nuclear fission. However the energy emission in=
the process of nuclear fusion is the same as that in the case of nuclear f=
ission. The ratio of atomic volume of deuterium and helium is, D : He =3D 1=
4=2E1 : 31.8. The larger atomic volume of helium than deuterium is attribut=
ed to the reason that the helium nucleus is stabilized in the lowest energy=
level than deuteron. Nuclear fusion energy includes also the energy of orb=
ital electron rings of deuterium when they expand their orbital radii to be=
those of helium. newedana

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Amateur Astronomy 6 June 21st 04 06:26 AM
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Astronomy Misc 0 June 20th 04 06:47 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney Amateur Astronomy 2 May 31st 04 04:30 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney SETI 0 May 30th 04 08:53 PM
when will our planet stop rotating? meat n potatoes Amateur Astronomy 61 March 27th 04 12:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.