![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charlie wrote:
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote: newedana wrote: But this field theory is faudulent, since these electric force fluxes moves with the charge And why does this make the "field theory" "fraudulent"? and can shift behind the charge, Unsupported assertion, actually contradicted by the evidence. E.g. synchrotron radiation shows precisely the *opposite*: the fields are strongest *in front of* the charge, not behind it! But you and Dr. Yoon don't care for inconvenient things like observations which contradict you, right? Newedana, if what Bjoern described that synchrotron radiation shows precisely the opposite of what Dr. Yoon claimed. It does. Here is the calculation: http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/jk1/lectures/node34.html Quote: "Thus, the radiation emitted by a highly relativistic charge is focused into an intense beam of angular extent $1/\gamma$ pointing in the instantaneous direction of motion." *In* the direction of motion. *Not* opposite to it! If someone wants to quibble that this is merely a calculation, then a small hint: synchrotron radiation has been known and studied for decades now. It is routinely used at lots of accelerators facilities for lots of purposes. Its characteristics are very well studied. Then the foundation of his model is shattered and the rest of the book fall apart. Indeed. And that's by *far* not the only trouble with his model. Dr. Yoon primary claim is that a moving electron is like a comet with the tails composing of the the electric field lines or force fluxes (Yoon term) lagging behind the moving charged particle. And that's complete utter nonsense, contradicted by the experimental evidence. If synchrotron radiation stuff proves the opposite. Then bid Yoonsatom model goodbye. Yoonsatom model is another attempt to explain QM and Relativity the newtonian way. I'm not sure if it's really "Newtonian". Looks more like a weird way of interpreting Faraday's ideas. But reality is far from newtonian and QM/Relativity may just be the tip of the iceburg. To illustrate. I can concentrate myself to be in your and Dr. Yoon room at night and if I will hard enough. You can see me image of me as apparition. Prove this to me, please. (oh, BTW, as I suspected: you are indeed Cinquirer/Qion/etc.) [snip] Bye, Bjoern |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new paradigm for physics update | Gary Forbat | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | June 21st 04 06:26 AM |
new paradigm for physics update | Gary Forbat | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 20th 04 06:47 AM |
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics | Stephen Mooney | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | May 31st 04 04:30 AM |
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics | Stephen Mooney | SETI | 0 | May 30th 04 08:53 PM |
when will our planet stop rotating? | meat n potatoes | Amateur Astronomy | 61 | March 27th 04 12:50 PM |