A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old April 26th 05, 04:41 PM
Bjoern Feuerbacher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Charlie wrote:
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:

newedana wrote:


But this field theory is faudulent, since these electric force


fluxes

moves with the charge


And why does this make the "field theory" "fraudulent"?



and can shift behind the charge,


Unsupported assertion, actually contradicted by the evidence. E.g.
synchrotron radiation shows precisely the *opposite*: the fields are
strongest *in front of* the charge, not behind it!

But you and Dr. Yoon don't care for inconvenient things like
observations which contradict you, right?



Newedana, if what Bjoern described that synchrotron radiation
shows precisely the opposite of what Dr. Yoon claimed.


It does. Here is the calculation:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/jk1/lectures/node34.html

Quote: "Thus, the radiation emitted by a highly relativistic charge is
focused into an intense beam of angular extent $1/\gamma$ pointing in
the instantaneous direction of motion."

*In* the direction of motion. *Not* opposite to it!

If someone wants to quibble that this is merely a calculation, then a
small hint: synchrotron radiation has been known and studied for
decades now. It is routinely used at lots of accelerators facilities
for lots of purposes. Its characteristics are very well studied.


Then the foundation of his model is shattered and the rest of the
book fall apart.


Indeed. And that's by *far* not the only trouble with his model.


Dr. Yoon primary claim is that a moving electron
is like a comet with the tails composing of the the electric
field lines or force fluxes (Yoon term) lagging behind the moving
charged particle.


And that's complete utter nonsense, contradicted by the experimental
evidence.


If synchrotron radiation stuff proves the
opposite. Then bid Yoonsatom model goodbye. Yoonsatom model is
another attempt to explain QM and Relativity the newtonian way.


I'm not sure if it's really "Newtonian". Looks more like a weird
way of interpreting Faraday's ideas.


But reality is far from newtonian and QM/Relativity may just
be the tip of the iceburg. To illustrate. I can concentrate
myself to be in your and Dr. Yoon room at night and if I will
hard enough. You can see me image of me as apparition.


Prove this to me, please.

(oh, BTW, as I suspected: you are indeed Cinquirer/Qion/etc.)

[snip]

Bye,
Bjoern

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Amateur Astronomy 6 June 21st 04 06:26 AM
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Astronomy Misc 0 June 20th 04 06:47 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney Amateur Astronomy 2 May 31st 04 04:30 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney SETI 0 May 30th 04 08:53 PM
when will our planet stop rotating? meat n potatoes Amateur Astronomy 61 March 27th 04 12:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.