New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
newedana wrote:

But this field theory is faudulent, since these electric force
fluxes
moves with the charge

And why does this make the "field theory" "fraudulent"?


and can shift behind the charge,

Unsupported assertion, actually contradicted by the evidence. E.g.
synchrotron radiation shows precisely the *opposite*: the fields are
strongest *in front of* the charge, not behind it!

But you and Dr. Yoon don't care for inconvenient things like
observations which contradict you, right?

Newedana, if what Bjoern described that synchrotron radiation
shows precisely the opposite of what Dr. Yoon claimed. Then
the foundation of his model is shattered and the rest of the
book fall apart. Dr. Yoon primary claim is that a moving electron
is like a comet with the tails composing of the the electric
field lines or force fluxes (Yoon term) lagging behind the moving
charged particle. If synchrotron radiation stuff proves the
opposite. Then bid Yoonsatom model goodbye. Yoonsatom model is
another attempt to explain QM and Relativity the newtonian way.
But reality is far from newtonian and QM/Relativity may just
be the tip of the iceburg. To illustrate. I can concentrate
myself to be in your and Dr. Yoon room at night and if I will
hard enough. You can see me image of me as apparition. There is
nothing newtonian about this. And only a model that makes QM
and relativity as subset can explain it.

Dr. Yoon and Newedana. Try to challenge synchrotron radiation
thing and this is your only salvation to make yoonatom stand any
chance. Should you fail. Then admit defeat and start learning
real stuff. Reality is not queerer than you think, but more
queerer than you can possibly imagine.. as the familiar saying
goes.

Ch.