![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rand Simberg" wrote in message .. . That's not really a useful comparison. Geez, Rand. I could say the night sky is black and you'd disagree. It's a lot easer to shut something down (ignoring the politics, of course) than to create something. Politics can't be ignored, particularly when the projects under discussion are politically driven. It is much more difficult to shut something down when political interests are involved - base closures, for example, are very hard fought. The fight will be no easier when the time comes to shut down STS. And there's also the reality that the shuttle flight schedule *will* slip, pushing retirement out who knows how many years? It's inevitable. -Kim- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aw Crap....Now the White House Wants Hubble Gone | Andrew Lotosky | Space Shuttle | 14 | March 7th 05 05:48 AM |
Space Shuttle Should Conduct Final Servicing Mission To Hubble SpaceTelescope (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 9th 04 01:27 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 5th 04 01:36 AM |
The wrong approach | Bill Johnston | Policy | 22 | January 28th 04 02:11 PM |
Shuttle dumped within 5 years | Ultimate Buu | Policy | 220 | October 5th 03 03:50 AM |