![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Christopher M. Jones wrote: ...However, a telescope in an orbit with such a low lifetime would also need frequent reboosts, which would require a lot of onboard propellant and frequent usage of some sort of thruster. Things which are not terribly compatable with high precision optical astronomy equipment... No, it just means you have to choose propulsion systems carefully, avoiding orthodox hypergolics and other systems which spew out condensible garbage that can easily contaminate optics. Xenon Hall-effect thrusters or an ammonia arcjet would be good choices. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | MrPepper11 | Policy | 437 | May 4th 05 03:56 PM |
NYT: Death Sentence for the Hubble? | Pat Flannery | History | 39 | February 20th 05 05:59 PM |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | Neil Gerace | History | 17 | February 15th 05 02:06 PM |
Congressional Resolutions on Hubble Space Telescope | EFLASPO | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 04 03:26 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |