![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() rk wrote: Sean O'Keefe, the departing administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, has yanked the agency's most important scientific instrument off life support. His refusal to budget any funds to service and upgrade the Hubble Space Telescope looks like the petulant final act of an administrator who made a foolish decision and then refused to back down in the face of withering criticism from experts. If the repair mission costs as much as building a new telescope, then we should build a new telescope using updated technology. This time with a mirror that's ground correctly. Improved ground based telescope resolution has taken away a lot of Hubble's necessity. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | MrPepper11 | Policy | 437 | May 4th 05 03:56 PM |
NYT: Death Sentence for the Hubble? | Pat Flannery | History | 39 | February 20th 05 05:59 PM |
Death Sentence for the Hubble? | Neil Gerace | History | 17 | February 15th 05 02:06 PM |
Congressional Resolutions on Hubble Space Telescope | EFLASPO | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 04 03:26 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |