![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ed kyle" wrote in message om... With currently planned EELV launch rates averaging only 2 per year per vehicle and with neither EELV agressively competing for commercial launches, an all-new launch pad is the last thing NASA needs to pour money into, IMO. The EELV launch rate will go up. The current doldrums are just an interlude. Everything - a new pad (actually, two new pads - one Delta , one Atlas), modified pads, and modifying 39 are all on the table and being traded vigorously. When Shuttle is retired, NASA should scrap LC 39 to save money. Personally, I don't see 39 coming out on top in this. Making it - and the integration facility - compatible with two different vehicles is just such a complex engineering problem. -Kim- *my opinions, not my employers'* |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
shuttle replacement staffing requirements ? | David Ball | Space Shuttle | 61 | April 21st 04 03:57 AM |
General stationkeeping deltavee requirements? | Erik Max Francis | Technology | 6 | January 25th 04 12:40 AM |
Requirements / process to become a shuttle astronaut? | Dan Huizenga | Space Shuttle | 11 | November 14th 03 07:33 AM |
NASA Human Rating Requirements Available On Web Site | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 1 | July 29th 03 11:41 PM |
NASA Human Rating Requirements Available On Web Site | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 1 | July 29th 03 11:41 PM |