![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a discussion going on in a space oriented web log group about the
"live" coverage of the mars landing. The point was, that unlike all previous missions we could remember, the people at JPL/NASA were acting as if the landing confirmation signals they were watching represented a live right now event, never mentioning, as everyone seemed to on pathfinder/viking et al that in fact the event had actually happened 10 minutes before, and this was just the first news we had of what had happened. We all agree it was more exciting this way, and even went to the metaphysical that in relativistic terms, "now" is defined by the speed of light, and this caveat is nothing more than a de-energizing footnote. however: the fact that it was not mentioned on any of the coverage we saw suggested that the decision was made as policy to view incoming signals as live for the sake of the public event. Does anyone here know if this is in fact true, or did anyone here hear NASA/JPL mention the 10 minute lag Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Station spacewalk briefing Feb. 24; live TV coverage Feb. 26 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | February 20th 04 05:33 PM |
Any interest in more live MER Mission Control Coverage? | David Fred | Space Science Misc | 4 | February 13th 04 05:53 AM |
KSC Web To Provide Live Coverage Of SIRTF Launch | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | August 20th 03 06:34 AM |
Live coverage - webcast info for Echostar IX / Telstar 13 SeaLaunch on Aug 7 | Rusty B | Policy | 0 | August 5th 03 09:43 PM |
Live coverage - webcast info for Echostar IX / Telstar 13 SeaLaunch on Aug 7 | Rusty B | History | 0 | August 5th 03 09:43 PM |