![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earl Colby Pottinger wrote:
Anthony Frost : In message Sander Vesik wrote: Keith F. Lynch wrote: By the time it's noticed that a ship is approaching earth at 90% the speed of light, it's far too late to do anything about it. And when it hits, it will devastate a continent. You need an early warning system that will spot any such 1-2 light minutes out and then you shoot a stream of protons at 99.9999+% of lightspeed at it and watch it blow up. And hope it takes less than 12 seconds to get the cannon aimed and firing. Much, much less than 12 seconds in fact because, even if you've managed to destroy it, you've still got a cloud of lumpy plasma heading for you at nearly 90% of lightspeed which isn't going to do your atmosphere any good. You seemed to make very limited range for detection. If the SS is detected one light year out then you have just over a months warning. If you fire soon after that warning you show intercept the SS about 15-18 light days out. That's a moderately dense net. A light year out, a months warning. Assuming a tenth of that is light travel time to the sensor, and assuming it's passive, that's around a thousand detectors. Then there is the interesting issue of how you detect a non-emitting body being as stealthy as it can going past a light week away. How brightly would such a body make interstellar plasma glow? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Light year distance question | Tony Sims | Technology | 7 | April 29th 05 04:41 PM |
Sonic boom, Light Boom? | Jan C. Vorbrüggen | Science | 8 | November 26th 03 04:42 PM |
Ed Lu letter from space #13 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 2 | October 28th 03 10:35 PM |
JPL Researchers Unveil Superconductor-based Light Detector | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | October 23rd 03 09:13 PM |
SPACE SHUTTLES over JERUSALEM | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 15th 03 10:03 AM |