![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JRS: In article , dated Sun, 12
Dec 2004 07:57:45, seen in news:sci.space.station, Derek Lyons posted : "Revision" k@tdot-com wrote: The ISS should be moved to the L1 point. Russia, China, or ESA could do it. Maybe in about two or three centuries when they have handwavium drives and unobtanium fuel. Otherwise, the electronics on the ISS are fried after the transit through Van Allen belts as with current technology the only way to move something that big and heavy is to spiral out slowly. (In particular, the solar arrays won't stand much acceleration.) With the technology needed to give ISS a significant acceleration, we would certainly have also the technology to add such rigging as is needed to rigidise the solar arrays. Consider that the technology of 1805 could brace masts carrying sails against strong winds; and we have better materials for ropes than they had. Since the acceleration, if at all strong, need only be relatively brief, it should be perfectly possible to work with only the solar energy from fixed arrays. Those who "sail" below the sea may tend to forget what *real* sailors could do. -- © John Stockton, Surrey, UK. Turnpike v4.00 MIME. © Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links; some Astro stuff via astro.htm, gravity0.htm; quotes.htm; pascal.htm; &c, &c. No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soyuz TMA-5 transport spacecraft relocation to the ISS module Zarya | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 6th 04 08:09 PM |
Soyuz Relocation Preps Continue; Expedition 10 to Have Quiet Thanksgiving | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | November 25th 04 04:22 PM |