A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MSNBC - How a 'safe haven' could help save Hubble



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old December 9th 04, 12:52 AM
Henry Spencer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Tom Kent wrote:
I don't know of a lot of science missions that are cancelled.


That says more about your limited knowledge than about the state of NASA
science missions, I'm afraid. The canceled ones don't generally issue
salvos of press releases and get major media coverage.

Hubble made it...


Only after quite a struggle, though -- Hubble was originally supposed to
be a mid-1970s project, and it ended up launching at the end of the 1980s.
Moreover, that was a "flagship" project -- NASA could and did sacrifice
other missions to protect Hubble's funding.

...We have all sorts of satellites
and telescopes orbiting the earth, most of which never had to seriously
fight for funding...


You clearly have never participated in trying to get such a mission funded.
*All* of them have to seriously fight for funding.

As a case in point, Hubble originally had an X-ray counterpart, AXAF. It
was repeatedly delayed by funding shortages -- it was supposed to be a
1980s project. A design shakeup in 1992 split it into two spacecraft.
One of them became Chandra, finally launched in 1999... but the other is
dead and forgotten.

...Why is NASA in the telescope
building buisness? Or the monitoring of greenhouse gases buisness for
that matter?
It seems that its becoming more and more that just because the platform
is based in space, it is NASA's juristiction.


This isn't something that's "becoming" -- it's always been this way.
Now mind you, it probably shouldn't be, but it is.

Telescopes are a bit of a different monster. They're still about space
exploration, just from a distance.


Uh, no, they're about astronomy, which only rarely has much to to with
space exploration, despite some superficial similarity.

My view is NASA should step away from its emphasis on science. NASA
should be developing technology to move out into our universe.


There's a lot to be said for that. Trouble is, when NASA proposes to
spend money developing such technology, the response tends to be "and just
which *science missions* require this technology?"
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert |
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MSNBC - How a 'safe haven' could help save Hubble Jim Oberg Misc 81 December 14th 04 03:10 AM
No safe haven at Hubble.... Blurrt Space Shuttle 20 May 10th 04 06:37 PM
NASA Is Not Giving Up On Hubble! (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 2 May 2nd 04 01:46 PM
Congressional Resolutions on Hubble Space Telescope EFLASPO Amateur Astronomy 0 April 1st 04 03:26 PM
NASA Engineers Support Hubble Dale Amateur Astronomy 10 February 10th 04 03:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.