![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This news release reported on the creation of a "virtual telescope" to
combine the radio signals from widely separated radio telescopes in real time over the internet: Date Released: Friday, October 08, 2004 Source: Jodrell Bank Observatory Astronomers Demonstrate a Global Internet Telescope http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=15251 Something like this would be required to implement the method of detecting extrasolar planets from their radio emissions using very many widely separated dipole arrays, as discussed below. The report noted the data was transmitted over the high-speed internet networks that most universities world-wide are connected to. The idea would be for thousands of universities world-wide to set-up dipole arrays with several thousand dipoles each. The dipoles are quite cheap consisting simply copper wire, so there is no problem of the cost of the arrays for each university, and any empty athletic field would do to hold the arrays. Bob Clark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Robert Clark ) Subject: Will amateur radio astronomers be the first to directly detect extrasolar planets? Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.space, rec.radio.amateur.antenna, sci.astro, sci.astro.seti, sci.space.policy Date: 2001-05-23 11:15:07 PST The existence of extrasolar planets has been inferred from the wobbling seen in some stars. Their actual light still has not been detected or distinguished from that of their parent stars. The long wavelength radio bursts that emanate from Jupiter have led to suggestions that extrasolar planets might be detected by searching for such bursts in the vicinity of stars: Opening a New Window on the Universe: High Resolution, Long Wavelength Radio Astronomy, 2.5.2 Extrasolar Planets, by Joseph Lazio http://rsd-www.nrl.navy.mil/7213/laz...eb/node34.html However, sensitive searches have so far failed to detect them. This is undoubtedly due to distance attenuation for such planets light-years away. The distance to Jupiter ranges up to 9 x 10^8 km. A star 10 light-years away is at 9 x 10^13 km, a factor of 10^5 larger than the Jupiter distance. The Jovian radio bursts have been detected by amateurs with simple dipole antennas: Radio-Jupiter for Amateur Observers, By Jim Sky [expired link: http://******.com/SAS/bulletin/Sas44....html#Jupiter] try instead NASA Radio JOVE Project Home Page, http://radiojove.gsfc.nasa.gov/ PROJECT P5-2. JUPITER-IO MAGNETOSPHERE RADIO NOISE http://www.elmag5.com/jupiter-io.htm With its Radio JOVE project NASA also distributes low-cost dipole kits to schools: How To Hear Radio Signals From Jupiter http://www.spacetoday.org/SolSys/Jup...iterRadio.html Radio JOVE http://spacescience.com/headlines/y2...may_1.htm?list The proposal is for amateur radio astronomers to set up arrays of such low cost dipole antennas world-wide. The T-shaped dipoles have the advantage of steerability, but the vertical dipoles have the advantage of simplicity and low cost for setting up large arrays. An example of a steerable dipole array is the one that first discovered the Jovian decametric emissions: The Discovery of Jupiter's Radio Emissions How a chance discovery opened up the field of Jovian radio studies http://radiojove.gsfc.nasa.gov/libra...discovery.html The signals from the various arrays would be combined digitally to form a world-wide radio telescope. The large-wavelengths being detected simplify the task of combining the signals interferometrically. GPS transmitters are now available that can give locations to within inches: NASA satellite technology goes down on the farm http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0105/11farm/ The clocks in such transmitters also provide timing at better than nanosecond resolution. The signal strength for Jupiter at 10 light-years would decrease as the square of the distance, so would be smaller by a factor of 10^10. However, the extrasolar Jovian planets detected so far have been close in to their primaries and are expected to produce stronger radio emissions than Jupiter, perhaps, 100 to 1000 times more intense. Using the optimistic estimate of 1000 times greater intensity would require 100,000 separate arrays with 100 dipoles or 10,000 arrays with 1,000 dipoles to detect such emissions. Bob Clark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
How smart are SETI@homers? | Andrew Nowicki | Policy | 212 | June 3rd 04 01:02 AM |
New Solar System Model that explains DW 2004 / Quaoar / Kuiper Belt and Pluto | hermesnines | Misc | 0 | February 24th 04 08:49 PM |
First Extrasolar Planets, Now Extrasolar Moons! (Eddington) | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 8th 03 07:06 PM |
Stars Rich In Heavy Metals Tend To Harbor Planets, Astronomers Report | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 21st 03 06:10 PM |