![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without a doubt more aperture is better, all other things being equal, when
it comes to deep sky objects. The 127mm is a fine telescope; I own one. But I also don't use it for deep sky, visual or imaging. The 10-inch is over 4 times the light capture area of the 127mm, again everything else being equal, and that means significantly brighter views of deep sky stuff. -- Yours Truly, --- Dave ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 'raid if you're afraid you'll have to overlook it. Besides, you knew the job was dangerous when you took it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Dave Mitsky" wrote in message om... I'd like to hear your opinions on whether a 127mm Orion Maksutov-Cassegrain is a better deep-sky telescope than a 10" Orion or Hardin Dob that is now on sale for about the same price. Don't laugh I have a very good reason for collecting this information. Dave Mitsky |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
8.4-meter Mirror Successfully Installed in Large Binocular Telescope | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 9th 04 08:06 PM |
Congressional Resolutions on Hubble Space Telescope | EFLASPO | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 04 03:26 PM |
Telescope for Child | Vedo | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | November 21st 03 03:38 PM |
Lowell Observatory and Discovery Communications Announce Partnership To Build Innovative Telescope Technology | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | October 16th 03 06:17 PM |