![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Consider a boundless Universe in which voids form, for want of a better analogy, much like bubbles form in Swiss cheese or cavitation occurs in water. Further, consider our universe to be like one of those bubbles into the vacuum of which matter outgassed from the wall of the expanding void, and we have everything we need to very satisfyingly answer three long-standing, nagging questions: Where is the missing matter?, Why does the red shift increase with distance?, and, Why is there a horizon beyond which we can't see? In order to answer these questions, three propositions need to be accepted; the first being that the Universe isn't homogeneous (it's gravitationally lumpy (maybe because it's full of bubbles like ours)), the second being that the Universe (of which our universe is a part) exerts attractive gravity everywhere, and the third being that gravity follows an inverse square law. Now, If we consider the Universe to be infinite and anisotropic, then the matter dispersed in our universe will be differentially attracted by the lumpy gravity behind the wall, and the matter closest to those attractors will be attracted most strongly. Its acceleration as it heads for them will, therefore, increase more and more as it gets closer and closer to them and its red shift will increase until it hits the wall and is absorbed by the Universe. When that happens it will disappear, will cease to exist in our universe and will be perceived as missing. Then, since it's gone and we can no longer detect it or any of the other matter which has been absorbed by the Universe, we know where the "missing" matter went, why the red shift increases with distance, and why the horizon is where we can't see past where the missing matter went home. This is just a rudimentary conjecture and I haven't worked out any of the details yet, but I'd welcome any serious critique outlining anything I've missed. Of particular interest to me would be any data relating to the disappearance of stellar objects (like Novae) if their red shift was known when they blew up. Seems to me that if far red shifted Novas blew up before less far red shifted ones did, then the bubble is collapsing. Thanks, John Fields -- John Fields |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 8 | May 26th 04 04:45 PM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Shuttle | 3 | May 22nd 04 09:07 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | May 21st 04 11:44 PM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Station | 0 | May 21st 04 08:02 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Policy | 0 | May 21st 04 08:00 AM |