![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ashmore's Paradox. 14/11/03
I would like to post a result that was thrown up in my research. Why is the Hubble constant the same as 'hr/m per cubic metre of space'? For each cubic metre of space, take the planck constant, multiply it by the classical radius of the electron then divide by the rest mass of the electron. This gives you 2.1exp(-18) per sec. Change this to astronomical units and you get 64 km/sec per megaparsec - the Hubble constant as measured by Reiss, Press, Kirshner in 1996. In Kirshner's book 'The Extravagant Universe' he says that all recent values of H lie in the range 70 +/- 7 km/s per Mpc. Thus, all values of H lie in the range (1.1 +/- 0.1) hr/m per unit metre of space. If this is pure coincidence then it a very remarkable one indeed. For more information visit my website at www.lyndonashmore.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ashmore's Paradox | Lyndon Ashmore | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 21st 03 01:44 PM |
Ashmore's Paradox | Lyndon Ashmore | UK Astronomy | 0 | November 14th 03 09:32 AM |
Fondation on Olbers' Paradox | telove | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 28th 03 12:09 AM |
Foundation on Olbers' Paradox | telove | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 26th 03 09:39 PM |