![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
recently i saw a newspaper article alluding to hawkings rejection of big
bang....about 8 yrs ago he was quoted as saying he could buy into many little bangs, but not one big one sounds to me like vindication of hoyle and narlikar.....oscillating universe with creation events------bangs----at the minima,,,,,,every 200 billion years....i know there is no support for big bang except in princeton and nasa......when will they admit they have been lying to american schoolkids for 40 years??? art swanson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hawking says he's solved black-hole riddle | MrPepper11 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 15th 04 03:45 PM |
BIG BANG really a Big Bang BUST | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 27 | November 7th 03 10:38 AM |
Galaxies without dark matter halos? | Ralph Hartley | Research | 14 | September 16th 03 08:21 PM |
A dialogue between Mr. Big BANG and Mr. Steady STATE | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 12 | August 6th 03 06:15 AM |