![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 19:03:45 GMT, nobody wrote:
For my money, the black drop appears to be substantially caused by the eye's own optical illusion, and is dependant upon the image scale of the eyepiece (the effect was more pronounced at what experience tells me is medium magnification and wasn't noticable when the Venus image was very small (zooming out the Photoshop image greatly) or very large (highly zoomed in.) Thus, in addition to the eye playing tricks, the magnification, quality of the optics and the seeing most likely contribute to the effect, positively or negatively. The problem is that for all theories at the moment, I'm hearing examples of images taken with equipment/conditions that counter each theory. Despite the massive number of images taken of the event, I've had very few equipment/conditions/black-drop (y/n) reports sent in yet [HINT HINT!]. Unless there's data to back it up, theories will simply stay as theories. For my part, I believe it's caused by equipment quality and the contrast of the image that is being observed. However, I'd dearly like to gte some proof. -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Bang & Black Holes -- worse conceptual problem thanmatter/antimatter asymetry? | [email protected] | Research | 0 | May 13th 04 11:25 AM |
The last cry of matter (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 27th 03 02:42 PM |
ESA's Integral discovers hidden black holes (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 3 | November 17th 03 02:14 PM |
Big black holes sing bass | Cathy | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 11th 03 04:48 AM |