If life is normal... (Crossposted)

In message , Dennis
Taylor writes

"randyj" wrote in message
...

"Dennis Taylor" wrote in message
. ca...
--snip


Doesn't the moon also keep the earth's axis from wobbling around any more
than it does, such that if we didn't have the moon, there would be way
more
climate
variation than we now have?


I've heard that, although I've not seen a specific explanation of why that
should be so. I'm also a little suspicious, since Venus & Mars don't have a
large moon, and their axes aren't all that out of whack (same with Mercury,
as a matter of fact). It *is* possible that we just happen to be in a period
where all the inner planets have reasonable tilts, but I'd be more inclined
to question the reason for the theory in the first place, in the absence of
any observed evidence.

I think that Mars and Venus are part of the evidence for the theory
being correct! The axis of Mars is supposed to have varied between near
zero and fifty degrees, though I can't remember if this is just theory
or there is some evidence for it, and Venus can be thought of as "upside
down" - it's rotating very slowly "the wrong way" compared to the other
planets, so its inclination is usually expressed as 177 degrees, not 3.
--
"Roads in space for rockets to travel....four-dimensional roads, curving with
relativity"
Mail to jsilverlight AT merseia.fsnet.co.uk is welcome.
Or visit Jonathan's Space Site http://www.merseia.fsnet.co.uk