![]() |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce Kille" wrote in message .. . With or without any future service the Hubble will some day go offline. There have been a lot of ideas floating around as to what to do then. I was wondering if it could be possible to boost it to a LaGrange Point, rather than de-orbit it? Is an earth-moon point stable? I know the earth-sun point can be used as the SOHO satellite is there, but it would require a lot more fuel to reach. Apparently, recovery of the Hubble for placement in the Smithsonian is not possible, so I wanted to put an alternative idea out for discussion. Bruce I have read the extensive thread that my question has started, but I think most of you missed my point. I said once the Hubble was OFFLINE what should we do with it. My idea was to find a way to preserve it in space as a museum piece, since it is not practical to return it to the Smithsonian here on earth. Most of the posts talked about how it could not function at other orbits, etc., which was not my question. Rather than send a drone to de-orbit Hubble why not boost it to a LaGrange point or perhaps Geo-sync orbit, where in its offline state it could be visited in the future... Bruce |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Urged to Reconsider Hubble Decision | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 116 | April 2nd 04 07:14 PM |
Hubble Servicing Mission 4 cancelled? | Richard Schumacher | Space Shuttle | 10 | January 26th 04 10:13 AM |
Hubble. Alive and Well | VTrade | Space Shuttle | 12 | January 21st 04 05:57 AM |
The Death of Hubble...When Will it Come? | MasterShrink | Space Shuttle | 7 | January 21st 04 05:49 AM |
The Hubble Space Telescope... | Craig Fink | Space Shuttle | 118 | December 6th 03 04:41 PM |