![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gamma rays are gravitationally deflected or blocked by cosmic matter. Gravitational waves are not, Einsteinians teach:
"Unlike light, gravitational waves don’t care about matter in any way. You can pass gravitational waves through the vacuum of space, through a lens, prism, or other material, or even through the solid Earth itself, and they will continue to propagate at the speed of gravity." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startsw...instein-wrong/ Therefore, gamma rays and gravitational waves CANNOT arrive "from the same location of the sky", just two seconds apart: "On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2017-30 The speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON, as originally ("without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations") proved by the Michelson-Morley experiment: "Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether." Banesh Hoffmann, Relativity and Its Roots, p.92 https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-It.../dp/0486406768 This implies that Einstein's spacetime does not exist and neither do LIGO's gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime). LIGO fakers still feel safe, protected by the all-powerful ideology of the Einstein cult, but in the long run they are doomed. LIGO fakers: "So the fact that the speed of gravitational waves is equal to the speed of electromagnetic waves is simply because they both travel at the speed of information." https://discovermagazine.com/the-sci...speed-of-light Is "speed of information" defined in physics? Brainwashed theoretical physicists: "Who cares?" See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LIGO Fakers Know No Limits | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | September 6th 20 04:40 PM |
LIGO's Neutron-Star-Merger Event: Fake More Than Obvious | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | December 9th 18 01:56 PM |
How LIGO Conspirators Discover Neutron Star Gravitational Waves | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 5th 17 08:44 AM |
Why LIGO Conspirators Don't Fake Neutron Star Gravitational Waves | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | June 2nd 17 11:57 PM |
Why LIGO Cannot Fake Neutron Star Gravitational Waves | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | June 15th 16 07:54 PM |