|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 1st 21, 10:54 PM
posted to sci.astro
|
|||
|
|||
Consensus in Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science
If Doppler effect in light is taught, only the moving-source scenario is discussed, for the simple reason that in the moving-observer scenario the speed of light is explicitly variable. If the moving-observer scenario is taught, either light is not mentioned at all, in 99% of the cases, or enough confusion is introduced so that the variability of the speed of light relative to the moving observer is camouflaged:
Doppler Effect: Moving Observer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHpPsnJNKrk See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 12th 20 06:15 PM |
| Einsteinian (Both Post-Truth and Post-Sanity) Science | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 18th 20 11:27 PM |
| Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 25th 19 03:33 PM |
| Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | December 20th 17 11:37 PM |
| Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | November 6th 17 06:18 PM |
Threaded Mode