A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Equivalence Principle Disproves Einstein



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old September 29th 20, 11:09 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default The Equivalence Principle Disproves Einstein

"To see why a deflection of light would be expected, consider Figure 2-17, which shows a beam of light entering an accelerating compartment. Successive positions of the compartment are shown at equal time intervals. Because the compartment is accelerating, the distance it moves in each time interval increases with time. The path of the beam of light, as observed from inside the compartment, is therefore a parabola. But according to the equivalence principle, there is no way to distinguish between an accelerating compartment and one with uniform velocity in a uniform gravitational field. We conclude, therefore, that A BEAM OF LIGHT WILL ACCELERATE IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD AS DO OBJECTS WITH REST MASS. For example, near the surface of Earth light will fall with acceleration 9.8 m/s^2." http://web.pdx.edu/~pmoeck/books/Tipler_Llewellyn.pdf

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. SO lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values. This is known as the gravitational red shift of light." https://courses.physics.illinois.edu...re13/L13r.html

That is, as light falls in gravity, its speed and frequency increase proportionally, as predicted by Newton's theory. The wavelength remains constant.

This means that there is no gravitational time dilation - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense.

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABOUT THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE Koobee Wublee Astronomy Misc 2 March 30th 11 02:55 AM
A new equivalence principle Jean[_2_] Astronomy Misc 4 August 23rd 09 05:05 PM
Baron Munchausen tests Einstein's Equivalence Principle Jack Sarfatti Astronomy Misc 0 August 13th 06 07:48 AM
EQUiVALENCE principle CAUSE of the GR DEATH.!! ( GR autopsy). brian a m stuckless Policy 1 May 22nd 06 01:07 PM
EQUiVALENCE principle CAUSE of the GR DEATH.!! ( GR autopsy). brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 1 May 22nd 06 01:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.