![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2020-06-11 21:16, Scott Kozel wrote:
On Thursday, June 11, 2020 at 1:24:46 PM UTC-4, David Spain wrote: Another feature not to be discounted are stops along the cable that remain in the atmosphere. You could have observation stations in both lower and upper troposphere, stratosphere and ionosphere. Something that is exceedingly difficult to do today, even with balloons. Something that I haven't heard addressed, is how to protect the cable from aircraft collisions. No matter how well marked and lighted, sooner or later an aircraft will hit it, resulting in the severing of the cable and the crashing of the aircraft. Perhaps the fixed part of the cable (the orbital tower) should end high up, higher than planes fly and significant storms blow. The small hop from and to the ground could be handled by winched cables, no big problem if one of them gets hit, although the load/cab being winched up or down may be lost, of course. The only important reason for anchoring the cable to the Earth's surface arises if the cable is used to accelerate significant amounts of _net_ mass (upwards mass flow downwards mass flow) to orbital or escape velocity, in which case the cable has to bend to the west (along the rising direction) and extract momentum from the Earth's rotation through its connection to the surface. This connection could of course also be designed to tolerate isolated airplane strikes, for example it could consist of many thinner cables that connect to widely separated points on the ground but converge to the central, main cable high up. The failure of one or two of the thin cables could be tolerated, and the cables could be replaced. Another comment: accelerating a cab outwards along the cable by "centrifugal" force at altitudes above the geosynchronous is not really a "free ride", because the momentum has to come from somewhe either from rocket propulsion, or from the cable's orbital momentum (which is not suistainable), or from the Earth's rotation, via tension in an inclined cable. -- Niklas Holsti niklas holsti tidorum fi . @ . |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gravity = mass-gravity + positron-space-gravity; superfluid heliumbehaviour #368 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 12th 11 08:08 AM |
Gravity = mass-gravity + positron-space-gravity; Ida & Dactyl #367Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 11th 11 08:10 PM |
Micro gravity and long duration flights. | Brian Gaff | Space Station | 1 | April 21st 09 12:22 PM |
Trying to fit gravity in the Micro | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 4 | July 22nd 07 01:04 PM |
Article: Macro, not micro: modified theories of gravity [Dark troubles?] | Robert Karl Stonjek | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 18th 07 01:48 AM |