![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So while I'm still on the subject, seems likely if you have gone to all
the trouble and expense to build a space elevator you'd design it so that the masses are attached to the cable in such a way that here are both anchor cable and transport cable. So the 'elevator' can pass by the 'station platforms' on the way up. At the counter-weight mass you might also have the cable to extend beyond with a slightly smaller counter-weight to give you negative g. Perhaps on a separate elevator with an 'upside-down' orientation! So the 'elevator' would be designed more like a vertical train. In fact it is probably wise to have multiple transport cable 'tracks'. Then you can simultaneously have trains going up and down. There could be separate cars on the train that could be unloaded at various drop-off/platform stops along the cable. Thus you could have stops at 300miles, 500miles, 1000miles (oops! Van Allen Belt!!) etc. up to and beyond geosynchronous orbit. The 'train' would need to travel fairly fast if you want to get to anywhere above the Earth's atmosphere in any 'reasonable' amount of time. But the 'elevator' could travel at different speeds at different points along its journey. With less air resistance the higher up it is the faster it can go. I'm thinking something along rail gun technology. Of course if you're willing to wait months to get to your destination, you can go more slowly. So the cabs have to be more like living habitats that move (imperceptibly). Another feature not to be discounted are stops along the cable that remain in the atmosphere. You could have observation stations in both lower and upper troposphere, stratosphere and ionosphere. Something that is exceedingly difficult to do today, even with balloons. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gravity = mass-gravity + positron-space-gravity; superfluid heliumbehaviour #368 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 12th 11 08:08 AM |
Gravity = mass-gravity + positron-space-gravity; Ida & Dactyl #367Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 11th 11 08:10 PM |
Micro gravity and long duration flights. | Brian Gaff | Space Station | 1 | April 21st 09 12:22 PM |
Trying to fit gravity in the Micro | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 4 | July 22nd 07 01:04 PM |
Article: Macro, not micro: modified theories of gravity [Dark troubles?] | Robert Karl Stonjek | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 18th 07 01:48 AM |