![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/18/20 10:53 PM, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:
"Doctor Who"* wrote in message ... On 5/18/20 7:43 PM, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote: "Doctor Who"* wrote in message ... On 5/18/20 7:27 PM, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... On 5/18/20 3:27 PM, wrote: * From* talk.origins Il giorno lunedì 18 maggio 2020 00:50:01 UTC+2, Wolffan ha scritto: On 17 May 2020, wrote (in ): Il giorno domenica 17 maggio 2020 06:45:02 UTC+2, Bob Casanova ha scritto: On Sat, 16 May 2020 14:43:10 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in talk.origins, posted by : Il giorno sabato 16 maggio 2020 23:30:04 UTC+2, Bob Casanova ha scritto: On Sat, 16 May 2020 03:51:34 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in talk.origins, posted by : I am tired to repeat to everyone what is written in links in www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm If the action reaction is violated (III principle) ..... change the inertia law ( I principle) and F=ma ( II ) .... so all is different from what you think. I found in test that F=ma increase with time at the same electric power. You think as newtonian man but but PNN is NON newtonian !!!!!! It is very difficult to understand if you don't make NON newtonian experiments. Read here more in https://www.okpal.com/building-a-rea...space-ship/?#/ This year F432 patent will be filed so everyone can reapeat the PNN experiments. We don't need more money to produce the collapse of astronautics to suppositories. We just want to enjoy the spectacle of what will happen when the know-how of the pnn is known :-) I've gotta side with Calmagorod on this one.* I'm a hair's width away from putting "Jeff Findley" in my killfile because of this "anti-pnn" fantasy. Oh no!* Please don't!* Whatever will I do?* /s Jeff you will do nothing, aside opposing us on usenet, you really can't do nothing against pnn. Of course he can't. He also can't stop the invisible pink elephant from ****ting in my garage. Jeff Findley is powerless, POWERLESS I tell you to stop fantastical creatures or ideas. Seriously, it's very simple; Put up or shut up.* Nobody on Usenet can stop you. If PNN works as you claims, good luck as you're on your ways to becoming billionaires and winning a Nobel or two for overturning physics as we know it. the only response about this is that you don't know how physics really works. You only know what you have read in books, but you have never done a physics experiment yourself. Far from it, I've done quite a few.* But again, if your idea is right, what do you care what any of us think. Prove it and you'll be billionaires. You never did a single electric space propulsion experiment in your life, because if you did it and you had success, you would talk like calmagorod. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA considers orbital outpost near moon as next big project | [email protected] | Policy | 18 | October 1st 12 12:37 AM |
NASA considers outpost beyond moon's far side | [email protected] | Policy | 12 | February 18th 12 06:41 AM |
NASA plans to put astronauts back on moon by 2018, using old Ap... | Michael Baldwin Bruce | Astronomy Misc | 5 | September 21st 05 12:29 PM |
Outpost, a longtime NASA tavern, damaged by fire | Jorge R. Frank | History | 21 | February 9th 05 12:31 PM |
NEWS: The allure of an outpost on the Moon | Kent Betts | Space Shuttle | 2 | January 15th 04 12:56 AM |