![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 11:59:35 PM UTC-6, Chris.B wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 03:28:25 UTC+2, Gary Harnagel wrote: Using simplified models for a sanity check on "more complex" one is a valid scientific operation. Not if it ignores every other factor. "Every other factor" cannot ignore the basic equations of atmospheric reflection, absorption and re-emission. MODTRAN is a well-characterized model used by the US Air Force: https://web.archive.org/web/20080428...et.asp?id=7915 "MODTRAN has been extensively verified and validated against FASCODE line- by-line calculations and measurement data. In a comparison of radiance codes for climate modeling (ICRCCM), MODTRAN was compared with three independent interferometer measurements of up-looking radiance and the overall agreement was excellent." The USAF has been using MODTRAN for a quarter of a century and find it to be quite accurate. Others use it, too. It's strange that someone who doesn't understand it doubts it but accepts other models that he also doesn't understand :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More Global Warming News ... | Hägar | Misc | 0 | January 6th 18 09:15 PM |
More Global Warming News ... | Hägar | Misc | 6 | November 13th 14 03:30 AM |
Sensible, mainstream news article about global warming: | Quadibloc | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | November 30th 09 08:50 AM |
Solar warming v. Global warming | Roger Steer | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | October 20th 05 01:23 AM |
Global warming v. Solar warming | Roger Steer | UK Astronomy | 1 | October 18th 05 10:58 AM |