![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 01:46:17 UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 04:14:19 UTC+1, Scott M. Kozel wrote: On Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 5:30:55 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote: More flexible, more powerful. http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/06/tech...son/index.html Lots of capability beyond what was needed or ever used. The huge irony is that RichA entirely missed the point. The re-usable rocket is a private venture. Thereby saving taxpayers' money on obscenely priced hardware. MrA ought to be drooling at the prospect of this free l[a]unch! ;-) Yes, I'm sure Herr Musk will ferry U.S. astronauts to and fro for nothing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
a COMPARISON between Space Shuttle and the "commercial space" | gaetanomarano | Policy | 1 | February 14th 10 07:34 AM |
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | September 15th 08 04:47 PM |
Micro space "concave" Macro space "Convex" | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 1 | April 24th 08 11:05 PM |
Redneck Space Shuttle (was: NASA RELIED on "Cottonelle" toilet paper to launch the space shuttle! ) | Raving Loonie | Misc | 1 | February 23rd 06 07:28 PM |