![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 12:08:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Schlyter wrote:
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 07:58:45 -0700, Chris L Peterson wrote: A law against cruelty to animals does not mean that animals have rights. From a human perspective it certainly does. Maybe the law against cruelty to animals is only there to allow the authorities to have a pretext to lock up sadistic people before they graduate to humans, and is not there because anyone (among those making the laws, that is) really cares about animals. So even the most outrageous tortures done to animals for some legitimate practical reason would remain perfectly legal. John Savard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The very first presidential effort to ever address Light Pollution: AlGore.org Statement on Light Pollution | Ed[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | April 25th 07 12:30 PM |
light pollution | g | Misc | 1 | October 26th 04 04:24 PM |
Light pollution | Steve | UK Astronomy | 7 | June 12th 04 08:42 PM |
Light Pollution | Philip | Amateur Astronomy | 19 | August 11th 03 10:48 PM |