![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The solid rocket boosters do not produce maximum thrust at all times.
In part this is to avoid excess aerodynamic forces, and in part this is to avoid excess G forces. I understand these things. What I don't understand is the following: At times the SRBs could produce more thrust yet don't, and at the same time the main engines are at less than minimum throttle. In other words, the designers could have had the SRBs produce XXX pounds more thrust, and the main engines produce the same XXX less thrust, and have chosen not to do so. Shifting the thrust from the main engines to the SRBs would result in an increase in payload since it increases the staging effect. The only limits I can think of being the throttleability of the main engines and the maximum thrust capacity of the SRBs. Obviously, the designers have already thought of this, and chose not to do so. I assume there must be some practical reason. What is it? -Thanks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Launch Schedule | Mark Lopa | Space Shuttle | 4 | October 15th 03 06:29 PM |
SRB Thrust Profile | Charles Talleyrand | Space Shuttle | 7 | October 15th 03 01:01 PM |
51-L: Relative Thrust at RSD | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 26 | August 22nd 03 03:43 PM |
Return to flight schedule | Doug... | Space Science Misc | 0 | August 15th 03 02:15 AM |
Woo hoo! New patent ... | Scott Lowther | Space Shuttle | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:09 PM |