![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:02:00 -0700 (PDT), Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: International Space Station ISS is a perfect platform to test whether Newtonian gravity and General Relativity are fake physics and to see if gravity is EM-gravity. I was reading the purpose or mission of ISS in Wikipedia and it says up-front that the mission is science research. Well, what better science question than to find out if General Relativity is a fake theory and that gravity is EM-gravity. Some data of ISS: 4.5x10^5 kg mass perigee 402km apogee 424km orbital decay 2km/month average speed 7.7km/sec So here again, we have to ask how can Newtonian gravity or General Relativity ever be true when the Earth itself is moving in Space at 29km/sec and how can this ISS orbit Earth in 7.7km/sec. So we see immediately the trouble with Newtonian gravity and General Relativity is that they require one of the masses to be assumed at rest, when in reality it is in motion. The dishwasher is at rest in the kitchen frame, the dishes move, in reality from the table to the washing machine. You are stuck in your past experience, Archie Pooh. w. In EM-gravity, both can be in motion, and what keeps the slower moving object gravitationally bound to the faster moving object is the force of electricity and magnetism of magnetic monopoles bending the Space around Earth and this bent space is actually spinning on an axis and the spinning motion forces the ISS to orbit at such a slow speed of 7.7km/sec. Now what I would like for ISS to perform is when the next rendezvous takes place that the rocket emit a bowling ball sized "moon, an artificial moon" (what the mass is, I do not yet know). Once emitted it should orbit the ISS according to Newtonian gravity or General Relativity. According to those theories, a artificial moon is viable for ISS. But according to EM-gravity, the mass has to be large enough of the size of asteroid Ida in order to have a orbiting moon. Ida has a mass of 10^16kg while ISS has a mere 4.5x10^5 kg. And that small mass is insufficient to create a EM-gravity cell that spins on its axis and drags along any moon. Of course on Earth we cannot execute such an experiment but on the ISS, it is ripe and prime for just this type of experiment. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
orbit speeds Ida & Dactyl Chapt16.15 EM-gravity #1310 New Physics#1513 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 23rd 13 05:47 AM |
Jupiter is a pulsar (2002 proof) and caused by EM-gravity on itspoles Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1484 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 10th 13 06:15 PM |
Solar gravity cell spins at 72.5 days for 1 revolution; Modern dayAntikythera Mechanism Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1473 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | April 6th 13 07:10 AM |
Chapt16.15 Maxwell Equations with EM-gravity; Gravity-Cell; OrbitalResonance; Spin-Orbit-Coupling #1451 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 2nd 13 01:23 AM |
Gravity cells to patch up the Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1446 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 31st 13 08:19 AM |