![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:43:58 +0000, Dr J R Stockton
wrote: The Russian object could have been a fragment of almost anything, including (but not especially) DA14. But it could not have been a recent fragment of DA14. That is the key point, since without it being a very recent fragment, it would be wildly unlikely that both the fragment and the parent would arrive here at the same time. As unlikely as any other pair of objects (which also shows the error of assigning odds to coincidences). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Russian Meteor Strike | [email protected] | History | 30 | February 21st 13 07:01 AM |
Russian: MEN WILL BE FIRST TO GO TO MARS | Jim Oberg | Policy | 25 | February 16th 05 11:05 AM |
Russian: MEN WILL BE FIRST TO GO TO MARS | Jim Oberg | Space Station | 21 | February 16th 05 11:05 AM |
Russian mirror | Babich Sergey | SETI | 0 | October 26th 04 11:25 AM |