A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

'Journey to the Far Side of the Sun' (1969)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old February 1st 13, 04:11 PM posted to rec.arts.movies.past-films,sci.astro.amateur
RichA[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 553
Default 'Journey to the Far Side of the Sun' (1969)

On Jan 26, 12:09*pm, calvin wrote:
On Jan 26, 11:07*am, moviePig wrote:









On Jan 26, 10:43*am, calvin wrote:
On Jan 26, 10:18*am, "Steven L." wrote:
Arthur C. Clarke had written a sci-fi story about a technician working
in some nuclear power plant gets put through a space warp and gets reversed.


One thing Clarke wrote about (which the "Journey" movie ignored) was
that the technician developed malnutrition despite eating a regular
diet. *That's because many nutrients have a chirality (right
handedness/left-handedness) about them: *An amino acid or a vitamin
molecule have a reversed mirror image too.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality_%28chemistry%29


And the technician's metabolism, having reversed molecules, couldn't
bind to the nutrients he was eating. *So they had to procure specially
designed reversed amino acids and reversed vitamin molecules to keep the
technician alive--at great expense.
...


The movie ignored that possibility, but it did not ignore
electrical polarity. *It just smoothed it over by saying
that the two planets were not reversed in that respect.


To me, though, the movie's interest was in the situation.
It also seemed to me that there was no need for the
astronauts to swap places again. *The movie should
have just ended with them enjoying reconciliation
with their wives.


The title seems puzzling. *"The far side of the Sun"? *I go there
annually...


Aside from your joke, the sci-fi premise that there could be
a hidden planet opposite the earth in its orbit does not
stand up to celestial mechanics. *Even if the earth's orbit
was perfectly circular, there could not be a planet in stable
orbit 180 degrees away from it. *Another planet would have
to be at what are known as Lagrange Points, 60 degrees
in front of or behind the earth.

I believe that a few very small objects have been found at these
positions in the earth's orbit, and much larger objects in
Jupiter and Saturn's satellite orbits, as well as in Jupiter's
orbit of the sun, the so-called Trojan asteroids.


I dream of the day when a good scifi is produced (in this century,
that is) that does not stray from science fact or possibility and is
still entertaining.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
the Sun as a ball (was Origin of Skt heli 'sun' anybody?) Yusuf B Gursey Astronomy Misc 0 February 2nd 10 09:52 PM
Journey to the Far Side of the Sun Coming Back In Print Andre Lieven[_3_] History 0 April 11th 08 07:18 AM
China To Build World's First 'Artificial Sun' Energy Device Art Deco Misc 2 January 26th 06 02:37 AM
The 'midnight sun' - how's it work? suave harv UK Astronomy 11 September 1st 05 01:35 PM
MX516 and ST7-ME Side to side Jaime Alemany CCD Imaging 0 February 3rd 04 08:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.