![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 16, 10:37 pm, Tom Roberts wrote:
One interesting consequence of some object or region with negative energy density is that GR predicts it could make possible the "warp drive" mechanisms that permit transport at faster than the speed of light. [rest of nonsense snipped] Tom is turning into a bigger crackpot. shrug We should have figured. Recall the resolution to the twins’ paradox, Tom was at the stage where he endorsed observed events are the manifestations of projection in path-lengths (sort of like shadows) from proper events. That was the last stage of denial. After waking up from that nonsense, Tom had endorsed the first resolution proposed by Born. These sorts of behavior in desperation among self-styled physicists have been thoroughly predicted by Koobee Wublee, and Koobee Wublee is not by any means a psychologist. shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...c3288cbc93ca08 Perhaps, Tom went over the edge due to his Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde struggles. shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...811efee3d3ae2c That would bring up what type of people Tom belongs in in his “three types of people”. Clearly, Tom belongs to the first group --- not only inept at understanding how the world works but also embracing mysticisms to rectify ubiquitous prevalence in mathematical and logical inconsistencies with SR and GR. shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...124977a68c1edc Now, warp drives and other Startrek mumbo-jumbos. Give us a break. shrug Orwell rules once again: ** FAITH IS LOGIC ** LYING IS TEACHING ** DECEIT IS VALIDATION ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** FICTION IS THEORY ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** WORSHIP IS STUDY ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** ARROGANCE IS SAGE ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** HANDWAVING IS REASONING ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE ** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS ** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY ** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy?? | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 23rd 06 08:47 AM |
What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy?? | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | May 23rd 06 08:47 AM |
'Negative energy' (Was 'the aether and...) | Bill Sheppard | Misc | 12 | June 8th 05 06:41 PM |
Astronomical effects of negative vacuum energy density | Ed Keane III | Astronomy Misc | 2 | April 15th 04 07:13 PM |