A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Forms of negative energy



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old January 17th 13, 08:29 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Forms of negative energy

On Jan 16, 10:37 pm, Tom Roberts wrote:

One interesting consequence of some object or region with negative energy
density is that GR predicts it could make possible the "warp drive" mechanisms
that permit transport at faster than the speed of light.

[rest of nonsense snipped]


Tom is turning into a bigger crackpot. shrug

We should have figured. Recall the resolution to the twins’ paradox,
Tom was at the stage where he endorsed observed events are the
manifestations of projection in path-lengths (sort of like shadows)
from proper events. That was the last stage of denial. After waking
up from that nonsense, Tom had endorsed the first resolution proposed
by Born. These sorts of behavior in desperation among self-styled
physicists have been thoroughly predicted by Koobee Wublee, and Koobee
Wublee is not by any means a psychologist. shrug

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...c3288cbc93ca08

Perhaps, Tom went over the edge due to his Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
struggles. shrug

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...811efee3d3ae2c

That would bring up what type of people Tom belongs in in his “three
types of people”. Clearly, Tom belongs to the first group --- not
only inept at understanding how the world works but also embracing
mysticisms to rectify ubiquitous prevalence in mathematical and
logical inconsistencies with SR and GR. shrug

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...124977a68c1edc

Now, warp drives and other Startrek mumbo-jumbos. Give us a break.
shrug

Orwell rules once again:

** FAITH IS LOGIC
** LYING IS TEACHING
** DECEIT IS VALIDATION
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** FICTION IS THEORY
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** WORSHIP IS STUDY
** BULL**** IS TRUTH
** ARROGANCE IS SAGE
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** HANDWAVING IS REASONING
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE
** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS
** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY
** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION

shrug
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy?? brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 May 23rd 06 08:47 AM
What is the logic behind "negative binding" energy?? brian a m stuckless Policy 0 May 23rd 06 08:47 AM
'Negative energy' (Was 'the aether and...) Bill Sheppard Misc 12 June 8th 05 06:41 PM
Astronomical effects of negative vacuum energy density Ed Keane III Astronomy Misc 2 April 15th 04 07:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.