A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SLS alternatives



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 27th 12, 03:13 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.astro,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Greg \(Strider\) Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 790
Default SLS alternatives

"Robert Clark" wrote in message
...

On Oct 23, 1:16 pm, Matt Wiser wrote:

On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 9:54:26 AM UTC-7, Robert Clark wrote:
On Oct 23, 1:40 am, "Matt Wiser" wrote:


Big problem for anti-SLS types: NO political support. There's a grand
total


of one congresscritter who's on record as opposing SLS: Rep. Dana


Rohrabacher (R-CA). And his motives are not entirely pu Space X
has a


facility in his district, and there's several commercial space
outfits with


facilities in SoCal, and no doubt some of his constitutents work at
those


firms.


Nice try, though....


Unlike many supporters of commercial space I'm neutral on the


question of the SLS. My view is that commercial space will go on


whether or not the SLS is funded.


Also, in an upcoming blog post I'll discuss that the very first


versions of the SLS scheduled to launch in 2017 will be able to launch


manned lunar missions.


Bob Clark


Which is something that NASA intends to to: The first human Orion/SLS
mission
will be Lunar Orbit. Maybe two or three lunar orbit flights of longer
duration before
going to L-2 or this President's precious NEO mission. I'm still a "Moon
First" type,
though..


After I wrote that post, I realized I left out a key word: with the
first launch of the SLS in 2017 we will have the capability to launch
manned LANDER lunar missions. This will be important since it will
provide an important, definite mission for the SLS from the very first
launch. The SLS has been called a "rocket to nowhere". That in fact it
will have the capability to return us to the Moon from the very first
launch will be an important point to promote its continued funding.


The key word there is "capability". Unfortunately there's really no real
drive or mission beyond platitudes to do so.

So it's still a rocket to nowhere that can do something no one really wants
to be pay for (monetarily or polically).


Likely this first launch in 2017 will serve as an unmanned test
mission to show the cryogenic space stages can safely land and take
off from the lunar service with a human-qualified capsule. But
certainly by 2019 we will be able to do the crewed missions, on the
50th anniversary of Apollo 11.


Able to do in 7 years? We're not even building any hardware to get there.
In 1962 we had firmer plans than now. And we were in a rush then.

So it's still a rocket o nowhere.



Bob Clark



--
Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SLS alternatives Robert Clark Astronomy Misc 6 October 27th 12 01:38 PM
Creation Alternatives Peter Riedt Astronomy Misc 1 March 26th 12 01:53 PM
Creation Alternatives Peter Riedt Astronomy Misc 0 March 26th 12 10:23 AM
Astromart Alternatives? AstroHoney Amateur Astronomy 4 January 17th 06 05:28 PM
Alternatives Wouff Hong Policy 0 October 13th 03 11:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.