![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm hoping that somebody can help me straighten my thinking.
In a Newtonian design reflector (for example), it seems to me that the secondary mirror is itself an aperture, and should introduce its own diffraction limiting effects. However, we can't detect them/they don't matter because the image is essentially already magnified by that point. But I'm not convinced. Do secondary mirrors effectively form apertures, if so do they create their own diffraction effects because of this? What effects can be detected? (I'm not talking about the effects of spiders or obstructing the primary mirror in any way). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
secondary mirror | Mickman | Amateur Astronomy | 17 | January 11th 09 02:37 PM |
reflection of secondary mirror and secondary mirror holder | brucegooglegroups | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | June 13th 08 02:33 PM |
Strehl and the diffraction limit | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 142 | February 13th 04 06:16 AM |
Help with secondary mirror | Lurking Luser | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | January 4th 04 10:26 AM |
Secondary mirror on a 10" f/5 | vL | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | September 27th 03 04:40 PM |