![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 19/07/2011 10:48 PM, Peter Fairbrother wrote: Bohica Bohica wrote: On Jul 12, 9:17 pm, Sylvia Else wrote: The Australian Government has, for reasons that have much to do with politics, and little to do with the environment, decided to throw $Au 10 billion into the bottomless pit that is renewable energy. Lest it all get turned into yet more solar panels and windfarms, I invite all comers to submit their plans for orbital power satellites. At least then we might get some technological advance for our money, even though I doubt we'd actually see any orbital power. Sylvia. You could make a **** load of parabolic reflectors aimed at the hot part of a Stirling engine, these things are about 6m wide and produce about 10Kw A Spanish comp[any makes them. The main problem is the colour, all shiny and not a bit og brown or green on them :-) That's actually close to what the generating part of an orbital power sat should be - lots of mirrors feeding sunlight to a Brayton cycle gas turbine. Forget acres of solar cells, they are too heavy and too expensive and too fragile. A Brayton cycle engine in that size range is lighter than a Stirling engine, no regenerator needed. Not as efficient, but cheaper and lighter to launch. Will it run maintenance free for a couple of decades? The compressor and turbine, I don't see why not. It's only one moving part, gas bearings are well-developed technology and there are no critical rotating seals. It's much simpler than a Stirling engine, and they reckon they can make those work for long periods in space. The generator? Yes, I'd think so too. The heat exchangers might need some work though, probably multiple redundant circuits. leak sealing and gas refills or something. Likewise the mirrors and mirror pointing stuff. But would it need to last 20 years without maintenance? If you are going to build it in the first place, you'd need a good launch capability anyway. And if it's providing a goodly proportion of your energy, you'd want to be able to fix it if it breaks. no matter what the built-in reliability claimed was. -- Peter Fairbrother Sylvia. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dust down those orbital power plans | Sylvia Else[_2_] | Technology | 12 | July 31st 11 12:09 AM |
Dust down those orbital power plans | Sylvia Else[_2_] | Policy | 19 | July 16th 11 10:05 AM |
Europe, Russia discuss 'orbital shipyard' plans | [email protected] | Policy | 50 | May 23rd 09 11:02 PM |
PopSci feature on Robert Bigelow and "CSS Skywalker" orbital resort plans | Neil Halelamien | Policy | 4 | February 17th 05 09:23 AM |
Rutan describes plans for orbital spacecraft | Neil Halelamien | Policy | 14 | October 11th 04 01:45 AM |