A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dust down those orbital power plans



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old July 19th 11, 06:35 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Peter Fairbrother
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 100
Default Dust down those orbital power plans

Sylvia Else wrote:
On 19/07/2011 10:48 PM, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
Bohica Bohica wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:17 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
The Australian Government has, for reasons that have much to do with
politics, and little to do with the environment, decided to throw
$Au 10
billion into the bottomless pit that is renewable energy.

Lest it all get turned into yet more solar panels and windfarms, I
invite all comers to submit their plans for orbital power
satellites. At
least then we might get some technological advance for our money, even
though I doubt we'd actually see any orbital power.

Sylvia.

You could make a **** load of parabolic reflectors aimed at the hot
part of a Stirling engine, these things are about 6m wide and produce
about 10Kw
A Spanish comp[any makes them. The main problem is the colour, all
shiny and not a bit og brown or green on them :-)


That's actually close to what the generating part of an orbital power
sat should be - lots of mirrors feeding sunlight to a Brayton cycle gas
turbine. Forget acres of solar cells, they are too heavy and too
expensive and too fragile.

A Brayton cycle engine in that size range is lighter than a Stirling
engine, no regenerator needed. Not as efficient, but cheaper and lighter
to launch.


Will it run maintenance free for a couple of decades?


The compressor and turbine, I don't see why not. It's only one moving
part, gas bearings are well-developed technology and there are no
critical rotating seals.

It's much simpler than a Stirling engine, and they reckon they can make
those work for long periods in space.

The generator? Yes, I'd think so too.

The heat exchangers might need some work though, probably multiple
redundant circuits. leak sealing and gas refills or something. Likewise
the mirrors and mirror pointing stuff.


But would it need to last 20 years without maintenance? If you are going
to build it in the first place, you'd need a good launch capability anyway.

And if it's providing a goodly proportion of your energy, you'd want to
be able to fix it if it breaks. no matter what the built-in reliability
claimed was.


-- Peter Fairbrother



Sylvia.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dust down those orbital power plans Sylvia Else[_2_] Technology 12 July 31st 11 12:09 AM
Dust down those orbital power plans Sylvia Else[_2_] Policy 19 July 16th 11 10:05 AM
Europe, Russia discuss 'orbital shipyard' plans [email protected] Policy 50 May 23rd 09 11:02 PM
PopSci feature on Robert Bigelow and "CSS Skywalker" orbital resort plans Neil Halelamien Policy 4 February 17th 05 09:23 AM
Rutan describes plans for orbital spacecraft Neil Halelamien Policy 14 October 11th 04 01:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.