![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/8/2011 12:20 AM, Val Kraut wrote:
There certainly _is_ a national rationale to have the James Webb Space Telescope. Advancing scientific knowledge is imperative for human survival. How exactly does knowing what exactly the universe looked like ten thousand years after it first came into being, or a hundred years after it first came into being, going to help us? You could make an argument for a really high resolution system to image the planets, moons, and asteroids of the solar system, or image planets orbiting nearby stars as worthwhile, but even HST has proved inferior and obsolete to what can be seen with today's ground-based telescopes. Things like OWL would not only beat JWST by a mile, but be far cheaper to build, and far easier to update or do maintenance on - particularly with the Shuttle going into retirement. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Outsources JWST Launch to Arianespace | Ed Kyle | Policy | 1 | June 19th 07 05:16 AM |
JWST PROJECT SCIENTIST WINS NOBEL PRIZE FOR PHYSICS (STScI-PRC06-49) | INBOX ASTRONOMY: NEWS ALERT | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 3rd 06 10:22 PM |
Hubble's replacement - JWST woes | Victor | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | August 9th 05 06:44 AM |
ESA awards prime contract for instrument on board JWST (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | July 29th 04 05:05 PM |
JWST Deployment Video | Doug Ellison | Space Science Misc | 0 | August 18th 03 04:00 PM |