A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fallacy of Relativistic Doppler Effect



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 29th 11, 02:55 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,sci.astro
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,572
Default Fallacy of Relativistic Doppler Effect

On Mar 28, 11:35*pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
Let’s do a recap for the younger and future generations of physicists.

Yours truly started out the thread by pointing out no valid Doppler
shift exists under SR. *Well, either if it exists or not, SR is
garbage. *Please allow yours truly to explain.

If it doesn’t, the outcome is obvious. *However, after several failed
attempts at fudging the math, Daryl was able to cook one up.
Unknowing to the Einstein Dingleberries, SR is skating on ever thinner
ice for doing so.

In the past, the self-styled physicists were able to explain the
longitudinal relativistic Doppler shift from the equation of energy
transformation. *When confronted with the transverse Doppler shift,
they were able to conveniently tossing out the equation for time
transformation despite these two equations contradict each other all
the way.

Now, we have established that the time transformation cannot be used
to predict the relativistic Doppler effect. *Any mathematical fudging
must now all agree with energy transformation.

Guess what? *The rest is history. *With the time transformation out of
commission for good, energy transformation fails miserably at
delivering the prediction for transverse Doppler effect.

SR IS INDEED GARBAGE!

Come on, PD.


Come on, what? You set yourself on fire without any assistance. I'm
just happy to make smores.

It's remarkable that, through the flames, you perceive yourself
victorious and you perceive us to be the ones on fire. This is no
doubt due to an utter lack of self-awareness.

*Why don’t you behave like these morons Gisse the college
dropout and Inertial the high school dropout? *Or like Daryl who
continues to crank out voodoo math in desperate attempts to salvage SR
for a losing case. *It must have gotten through his skull that he
could cook up something again after that feat. *Any mathematicians
with half a brain would have recognized a checkmate coming several
posts before this, but not Daryl. *He just would not give up. *He must
be pulling his hair out by now.

Come on, Tom. *What is your excuse not to stay away from this thread
at all cost? *Scared?

Yours truly will take silence as a kowtow gesture from all the self-
styled physicists.

So, case closed. *SR IS JUST GARBAGE.

shrug


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DOPPLER EFFECT, SPEED OF LIGHT AND EINSTEINIANA'S TEACHERS Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 August 22nd 09 06:44 AM
DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 October 27th 08 07:47 PM
GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT AND DOPPLER EFFECT Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 5 August 5th 07 09:33 AM
TOM ROBERTS WILL EXPLAIN THE DOPPLER EFFECT Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 May 27th 07 06:46 AM
Classical transverse Doppler effect Sergey Karavashkin Research 0 April 13th 05 02:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.