![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 2, 11:42*am, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
On 12/02/2010 01:09 PM, oriel36 wrote: There are only two motions involved,intrinsic rotation which causes the day/night cycle with no more than a full 365 rotations in a year,given that daily rotation is independent of the orbital motion of the Earth. Is it? *Given 365 of those daily rotations in a 365-day calendar year, are the ones in January when the orbital motion is fastest really no longer than the ones in July when it's slowest? Oh, my. Much later in this thread, rec.arts.sf.written got added to the crossposting. I had no idea that the distinguished Oriel36 was a participant in the thread earlier. In fact, as the Earth orbits the Sun in approximately 365 1/4 days, the rotations of the Earth proceed at a completely uniform pace. The Earth's orbital revolution around the Sun speeds up and slows down, because when the Earth is closer to the Sun, its loss of potential energy is balanced by an increase of kinetic energy of orbital motion. But the Earth's rotation is unaffected. The stars will move through the night sky so as to return to their previous positions after 23 hours, 56 minutes, and 4 seconds at any time of the year. The Earth is a big heavy ball of rock, and so making it speed up or slow down would require prodigious amounts of energy, and somewhere to which to transfer the angular momentum involved. Now, though, the Earth's orbital motion _will_ lead (along with the inclination of the Earth's axis to the Ecliptic, in a way too complicated to explain here, but there is an explanation at http://www.quadibloc.com/science/eot.htm on my very own web page if you're interested) to something known as the Equation of Time, which means that you have to correct your sundial by up to 15 minutes if you want to set your watch by it. John Savard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Bang - formal name? | abzorba | Astronomy Misc | 214 | December 8th 10 08:17 PM |
Big Bang - formal name? | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 4th 10 05:03 PM |
Redshift and Microwave radiation favor Atom Totality and disfavorBig Bang #9; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory | Net-Teams, | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 31st 10 05:19 PM |
B, Big, Big Bang, Big Bang Books... | socalsw | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | June 7th 04 09:17 AM |
BIG BANG really a Big Bang BUST | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 27 | November 7th 03 10:38 AM |