![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Red shifts could be any of a number of things. There is no way of
verifying what a red shift is, and everybody knows it and even Hubble admitted it. They are just unwilling to say it. There is too much time, money, and energy involved in current incorrect cosmological thinking, and they don't want to admit to it and begin the process of rewriting the text books from grade school up, and as such, they are all cowards. There are plenty of exceptions in observable data to what current thinking about red shifts are. Anyone can find them on the net with a simple search. Well, it's time for the cowards to take a hike, because in 2014, with the new telescope, the JWST, which is three times more powerful than the Hubble, we'll get closer to understanding what red shifts are and what red shifts are not, without a doubt. And if that doesn't prove it beyond a doubt that current thinking is mistaken, and if it takes the next generation telescope to find out more and get closer to the truth of it, then I'll be here, waiting and laughing at all the cowards until the next gen telescope begins to pin it down without a doubt. Now. Run cowards! Run! John Ayres |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MONKEY SEE, MONKEY DO -- Another Ghastly Suicide Outside Smithsonian | Good Gawd! | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 19th 09 02:44 PM |
We forgot something | Pat Flannery | History | 18 | December 28th 06 10:25 AM |
We forgot something | Pat Flannery | Policy | 10 | December 28th 06 12:02 AM |